Nevertheless, there are subtle differences in the two versions of the model. First, note that the legs and feet on the birds are disproportionately thick in the questionable model (above right) and that they extend beyond the birds' tails in a manner they do not in the genuine article at left. (We leave aside here the matter of whether the flying birds' legs should extend beyond the tail. One of the ironies here is that, in the questionable model, the position of the feet vis-a-vis the tail is probably more faithful to the anatomy of a flying heron!)
A close-up view of the heads on the
questionable model. The treatment of the heads is less succecssful. Note that the heads are parallel in the genuine model and that they actually touch - or "collide!" - in an ultimately unsuccessul effort to duplicate the original. This decision may have been dictated by the technical difficulties in getting those long necks and heads to suspend in space as they do in the original. Lladró artisans are noted not only for their aesthetic but for their technical mastery - their ability to get long arms, legs, necks, and wings to occupy space as if they were suspended in it - or as if the air itself were holding them up. It's one of the telltale problems for counterfeiters, who generally don't have the technical expertise to be able to pull that off.
Given these other issues, the mark itself (pictured at left) is called into greater question. In the first place, the color's wrong. So much is made of the "Lladró blue backstamp" in collector discussion that some counterfeiters may not realize that the backstamp color for NAO is actually a dark brown, not blue. (See the page on genuine NAO marks.) I'm not bothered by the "dangling mark," (a term I use in my book Collecting Lladró to describe a backstamp in which the paint chip doesn't completely unfurl). What does bother me is the color and the poor definition of the NAO lettering. Though the pseudo-Greek stylization is faithful to the genuine mark, note the truncated left leg on the "N." I could be wrong; a wise observer doesn't ever say "never" when it comes to Lladró. But, the other things considered, this mark provides additional evidence that the questionable herons model is a counterfeit. (Finding More Info on Retired NAO)
The logo background and side border graphic on this site are provided courtesy of Absolute Background Textures Archive (www.grsites.com/textures). All other content and graphics on this site are © Peggy Whiteneck. No reproduction of any part of this content is permitted without the express permission of the web site author. |